Injustice Marriage Act
Kedi: “Isn’t fake marriage a crime?”
Ganesh: “It’s not just a crime; it’s a massive sin. One person’s whole
life gets destroyed.”
Kedi: “Then why are they free? Why didn’t the client
want the police? Can’t we give the address to the police?”
Ganesh: “Calm down. You’re getting emotional.”
Kedi: “Why do people even do fake marriages?”
Ganesh: “Because India has indeterminate, economic-settlement-based
marriage laws.”
Kedi: “Explain like a friend, not like a judge.”
Ganesh: “Imagine an exam where 2 marks and 99 marks both get “pass.”
That mess is indeterminate. The same with marriage: whether you stayed 2 days
or 20 years, the economic settlement can be similar. That’s why gangs do
2–5-day fake marriages for money.”
Kedi: “Solution?”
Ganesh: “First, alimony is not
part of Sanatan Dharma and Hinduism. Still, in Bharat, alimony law is
implemented. Then, we must add determinate laws to stop misuse and protect
Indians. And to become true Indians and humans, remove alimony from the
Marriage Act.”
Kedi: “How will determinate law stop it?”
Ganesh: Simple tiers:
– Married for less than 1 year → Separation =
annulment, zero maintenance.
– 2–7 years → Only the
partner who genuinely cannot survive alone gets limited maintenance.
– 7–21 years → Righteous
support.
– More than 21 years → 50–50 righteous split.
Husband and wife both give maintenance to each other.
Fix these time limits, and fake marriages lose profit.
Kedi: “Won’t people marry for fun, make kids, and then
annul in 1 year?”
Ganesh: “Child responsibility remains on both parents forever, married
or not. The financially capable parent pays for or raises the child.”
Kedi: “What if no kids, just sex for 1 year and then
annul?”
Ganesh: “Then why marry for sex at all? Live-in relationships,
dating—whatever—sex is available without marriage.”
Kedi: “Then why do people marry?”
Ganesh: “I didn’t know your mentality was this low.”
Kedi: “It’s not my mentality! Clients and friends say
it openly—marry for lifelong sex or to loot money.”
Ganesh: “That mentality must change. Real marriage is about completing
each other’s deficiencies so both reach wholeness and ultimately moksha.”
Kedi: “Who is the real criminal behind fake marriages?”
Ganesh: “The law itself. When a rule produces multiple results but has
no sub-rules to control those results, the rule becomes the criminal.”
Kedi: “Can the law become the god of justice again?”
Ganesh: “Yes—make time-based determinate sub-rules and create a Marriage
Examination Department to verify genuine need for maintenance or alimony. Then
the law stops being criminal.”
Kedi: “What is the real problem?”
Ganesh: “Merely performing one marriage does not give a husband or wife rights
over each other. One has to earn those rights by fulfilling responsibilities.
When a husband or wife does not fulfil their responsibilities, they also lose
their rights.”
Kedi: “I didn’t understand—rights and
responsibilities?”
Ganesh: “Suppose in your next life you get married. You and your wife
want to eat vada pav. Both of you will have to jointly arrange the money,
ingredients, and effort to cook it. If you say, “I won’t give money, I won’t
bring ingredients, and I won’t help make the vada pav,” then your wife won’t
give you vada pav—she’ll give you two kicks instead. You can’t say, “We got
married, so I have equal rights over the vada pav.”
Kedi: “Why won’t I get married in this life?”
Ganesh: “Do I want to get a marriage hall, or do I want to understand
marriage law?”
Kedi: “Marriage law.”
Ganesh: “Humans are embodiments of mistakes. Out of
greed, lust, ego, and status, they enter wrong marriages. When such a wrong
marriage breaks, it becomes the parents’ responsibility.”
Kedi: “If an economically weak wife separates from her
husband, shouldn’t she get financial support from him?”
Ganesh: “When a husband and wife separate and no longer wish to fulfil
their responsibilities toward each other or provide emotional and social
support, neither spouse has a responsibility to provide financial support to
the other. It is wrong for one spouse to be held responsible for the other
after separation. Husband and wife are only entitled to each other’s support
and rights as long as they are together.”
Kedi: “Isn’t it a husband’s responsibility to take
care of his wife for life once they are married?”
Ganesh: “Responsibility in any relationship should only be borne as long
as one is bound by that relationship. When the relationship breaks, the
responsibilities and rights also cease. Demanding rights and responsibilities
from someone even after the relationship has ended, without giving anything in
return, is an injustice.”
Kedi: “Are dowry and alimony the same?”
Ganesh: “Dowry and alimony are not part of eternal (Sanatan) marriage
rituals. An irreligious society that has abandoned Sanatan Dharma has turned
marriage into an economic partnership and added dowry and alimony to it. Every
person who marries for dowry or alimony is a criminal and a sinner.”
Kedi: “Is taking dowry and alimony a sin?”
Ganesh: “Just because the law recognises dowry and alimony does not
change sin into virtue.”
Kedi: “How are dowry and alimony sins?”
Ganesh: “Parents get their daughter married into a wealthy family, and
the very next day they instruct her to create trouble in her in-laws’ house.
They stage a fake fight and fake divorce, and through their daughter, they
extort alimony from the son-in-law. In doing so, they forget they are ruining
their own daughter’s married life. Earlier, the husband’s parents harassed the
daughter-in-law for dowry; now, the wife’s parents harass the son-in-law for
alimony. Both dowry and alimony ruin married life and turn those who demand
them into criminals.”
Kedi: “Are dowry and alimony sins in all cases?”
Ganesh: “Yes. Where there is a genuine marriage, there is no place for
dowry or alimony. Demands for dowry or alimony arise only in fake marriages
done out of greed, because those who enter fake marriages demand rights but do
not want to fulfil responsibilities—and that is why separation happens.”
Kedi: “If there is no dowry and no alimony in marriage
law, what will happen?”
Ganesh: “Everyone will marry with the intention of staying married for
life. Because there is no dowry, no one will harass the girl’s family or
torment the wife over dowry. Because there is no alimony, no one will file
false divorces or harass the husband’s family for alimony.”
Kedi: “Do divorces happen because of alimony?”
Ganesh: “Not just in India, but all over the world, false divorces are
filed solely to obtain alimony. Real divorces happen only due to domestic
violence, where either the husband or wife is extremely violent, or family
members are violent. Earlier, the alimony system existed only in foreign
countries, but when foreign laws were copied and alimony was added to India’s
marriage laws, millions of fake divorces have occurred since then. As long as
the alimony system remains in India’s marriage laws, fake divorces and fake
marriages will continue.”
Kedi: “Why are you so upset about fake marriages?”
Ganesh: “You have seen the pain caused to a man by a fake marriage for
alimony today. I have been witnessing the pain inflicted on Indians by fake
marriages for both dowry and alimony since 2009.”
Kedi: “Do fake marriages also happen for dowry?”
Ganesh: “You have only seen the tears of men victimised by alimony. For
dowry, wives have been burned alive, had their throats slit, or been beaten
until they became living corpses. You are fortunate that you haven’t had to
witness the suffering of a woman victimised by dowry—otherwise you would feel
even greater pain than for that man.”
Kedi: “If such violent crimes were happening because
of dowry, why wasn’t dowry stopped?”
Ganesh: “India’s law does not deliver justice to prevent injustice;
instead, it demands compensation for the injustice. That is why dowry was
banned and alimony was introduced.”
Kedi: “I don’t understand.”
Ganesh: “Wives were being murdered and tortured because of dowry, so as
compensation, laws were enacted under the alimony system that allow the murder
and torture of husbands.”
Kedi: “Did alimony exist before this marriage law?”
Ganesh: “It did not exist before. It was pre-planned
and added to the marriage act.”
Kedi: “How can you say it was pre-planned?”
Ganesh: “Before alimony was legally added to the
marriage law, people in the legal field already knew that practices like dowry
and alimony could damage marriage rituals and turn them into a kind of business
model. Such policies, if misused, can become tools to harass or humiliate
families and communities.”
Kedi: “Why didn’t people oppose it before this law was
implemented?”
Ganesh: “Many people did oppose it. However, when it
was added to the Hindu Marriage Act, some people began to believe that dowry
and alimony were part of Hinduism. In reality, dowry and alimony go against
Sanatan Dharma, Hindu culture, and basic human values that exist around the
world.”
Kedi: “After divorce, does a wife not deserve
financial support, which is called alimony?”
Ganesh: “You are asking about the wife. Why don’t you
ask whether a husband deserves something after divorce?”
Kedi: “A divorced man can usually handle financial
issues, but a divorced woman may find it more difficult to manage financially.”
Ganesh: “There are millions of financially vulnerable
women. But can a man be forced to take financial responsibility for just any
random woman — or for a woman who is no longer part of his life?
Many argue that alimony
contradicts a basic principle: a man should not be required to remain
financially responsible for someone who is no longer in his life — especially
when she made no meaningful contribution to his life or took any responsibility
for him. After divorce, an ex-wife and a complete stranger are essentially the
same in one critical respect: neither contributes anything to his current life.
Responsibility should be tied to contribution. No contribution → no
responsibility. Contribution is not only about finances; it is also about the
events, emotions, ethics, and entertainment one brings to a life. Forcing
someone to support a person who has made zero contribution to their life is
fundamentally unjust. That is why — at its core — alimony itself can be seen as
a form of legalized extortion / a moral crime.”
Kedi: “What happened after alimony was added to the
marriage law?”
Ganesh: “Increase in fake marriages, increase in fake
divorces, increased humiliation of husbands from their in-laws, rapid increase
in husband suicides, increased mental illness among husbands from fake legal
cases.”
Kedi: “What happened after dowry was added to the
marriage law?”
Ganesh: “Dowry was not added in the law; the law was
added against dowry.”
Kedi: “Why though? Wasn’t a similar law made against
alimony too?”
Ganesh: “Indian law is not only made to stop
injustice; sometimes it provides compensation for injustice. For example,
alimony is seen as compensation. Similarly, reservation policies are based on
the idea of compensating for historical injustice by giving reservation rights
to some communities and taking away reservation rights from the rest of the
communities. Many Indians are aware of the stupidity of the Indian Constitution
and still take pride in the unjust Constitution.
They don't understand
that taking away the rights of a community as compensation for injustice is not
justice; it is another injustice. To protect women from dowry, implementing
alimony to torture men is not compensation for injustice; it is another
injustice.”
Kedi: “I have never seen you so frustrated before.”
Ganesh: “I love justice. I hate injustice, and the
entire Constitution and marriage law are designed to make injustice legal. What
frustrates me most is that Indians are proud of this inhumanity-based Constitution
and marriage law.”
Kedi: “Any solution for fake marriages?”
Ganesh: Four things:
1. Compulsory pre-marriage
training on the real purpose and responsibilities of marriage.
2. Modern Swayamvar—boy and
girl choose each other; families only support.
3. Righteous family meetings
after engagement to check compatibility of mentalities.
4. Determinate marriage law
with time-based sub-rules and strictly no dowry and no alimony.
Today, marriages are taking
place for status and financial gain, and people are paying the price for this
shallow mindset. Only when people marry with the intention of transforming
their flaws into strengths and their incompleteness into completeness will
their married lives be redeemed by a higher purpose. When society’s mentality changes,
fake marriages will die naturally.
Note: This content represents one half of a chapter from Kedi Purana, a 64-chapter work authored by Kedi Ganapati.
Kedi Purana is a modern Purana of the present and final Kaliyuga of the current Kalpa.
"Free to learn. Free to share. If you feel it — feed the mission 🙏"
